Kejriwal’s Bail Plea in CBI Case Argued in Delhi High Court

Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi argues arrest was unnecessary, while CBI alleges close nexus and witness influence. Court decision pending.

Delhi, July 17, 2024 – The Delhi High Court is currently deliberating on a bail plea submitted by Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal in connection with a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) case related to the excise policy. The plea was presented by Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi on behalf of Kejriwal.

During the arguments, Singhvi asserted that Kejriwal’s arrest was unwarranted and described it as an “insurance arrest,” suggesting that it was timed to create an impact rather than based on substantial evidence. Singhvi emphasized the lack of material evidence against Kejriwal, questioning the necessity of his detention.

On the other hand, the CBI has firmly opposed the bail plea. The agency has alleged a close nexus between Kejriwal and certain officials involved in the case. Furthermore, the CBI accused Kejriwal’s party colleagues and his wife of attempting to influence witnesses, which they argued was detrimental to the integrity of the investigation.

The high-stakes hearing has attracted significant attention, given the political implications and the prominence of the individuals involved. The court’s decision on Kejriwal’s bail plea remains pending, and the next steps in this legal battle are eagerly awaited by both supporters and critics.

As the case unfolds, it highlights the ongoing tension between political figures and investigative agencies, raising questions about the balance between legal processes and political maneuvering in high-profile cases.